胡凯;

• 1:江西农业大学经济与贸易学院

摘要：

企业创新行为受到多种因素的影响表现出复杂的特征,从行业、企业及政府三个视角总结了国内外关于企业R&D行为影响因素的研究文献。其中,行业的视角主要包括市场结构、产业类型、行业技术水平等因素;企业的视角主要包括企业规模、人力资本、公司治理结构等因素;政府的视角则主要关注技术创新政策的效率。相对来说,从政府的角度研究技术创新政策对企业R&D行为影响的文献少得多。由于R&D活动的不确定性以及溢出效应,政府支持亦是影响企业R&D行为的关键因素,特别是我国国情有别于西方国家,政府在资源配置中发挥了重要作用。因此,从政府的视角探析技术创新政策对企业R&D行为的影响是一个值得进一步探讨的课题。

关键词： 企业;R&D行为;影响因素;文献综述

Abstract: An enterprise's R&D behavior is complicated as it was influenced by various factors.We review the relevant literatures from the three perspectives of industry,business and government.The industry perspective includes market structure,type of industry,and technology level;the business perspective includes firm size,human capital,and corporate governance;and the government perspective focuses on the efficiency of technology innovation policy.The literature is relatively much less which studies the influence of technology innovation policy on enterprise's R&D behavior from the government perspective.Due to the uncertainty and spillover effects of R&D activities,government's support is also a key factor affecting enterprise's R&D behavior,particularly in China,where government plays an important role in allocating resources.Therefore,it is worthy of further in-depth research to study the influence of technology innovation policy on enterprise's R&D behavior from the perspective of government.

Keywords: enterprise;R&D behavior;influencing factors;literature review

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(71163021);; 江西省社会科学规划办项目(08YJ105);; 江西省高校人文社科项目(GL0921)

通讯作者:

Email:

参考文献：

• [1]Franco Malerba,Luigi Orsenigo.Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific[J].Research Policy,1996(25):451-478.
• [2]Freeman C.The national system of innovation in historical perspective[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,1995,19(1):5-24.
• [3]Doloreux D.What we should know about regional systems of innovation[J].Technology in Society,2002,24(3):243-263.
• [4]胡凯.区域创新体系中企业主体地位研究[M].南昌:江西科学技术出版社,2007.
• [5]Scherer F M.Market structure and the employment of scientists and engineers[J].American Economic Review,1967(3):524-531.
• [6]Richard C Levin,Wesley M Cohen,David C Mowery.R&D appropriability,opportunity,and market structure:new evi-dence on some schumpeterian hypotheses[J].American Economic Review,1985(2):20-24.
• [7]Wesley M Cohen,Richard C Levin,David C.Mowery.Firm size and R&D intensity:A re-examination[J].Journal of In-dustrial Economics,1987,35(4):543-565.
• [8]Globerman S.Market structure and R&D in Canadian manufacturing industries[J].Quarertly Review of Economics and Busi-ness,1973,13(2):59-67.
• [9]Ronald E.Shrieves.Market structure and innovation:A new perspective[J].Journal of Industrial Economics,1978,26(4):329-347.
• [10]Henry H Villard.Competition,oligopoly and research[J].Journal of Political Economy,1958,(6):483-497.
• [11]Scherer F M.Size of firm,oligopoly and research:A comment[J].Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science,1965(31):256-266.
• [12]Luc L Soete.Firm size and inventive activity:The evidence reconsidered[J].European Economic Review,1979(4):319-340.
• [13]John Bound,Clint Cummins,Zvi Griliches,et al.Who Does R&D and Who Patents[M].NBER Working Paper,1982.
• [14]Pavitt K,Robson M,Townsend J.The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK:1945-1983[J].Journal of IndustrialEconomics,1987(3):297-316.
• [15]Marcela Miozzo,Paul Dewick.Building competitive advantage:innovation and corporate in european construction[J].Re-search Policy,2002,31(6):989-1008.
• [16]Frederico Munari.Does ownership affect innovation:assessing the impact of privatisation processes on innovation activities[J].European Business Organization Law Review,2003(4):553-571.
• [17]Wallsten S J.The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D:The case of the small business innova-tion research program[J].RAND Journal of Economics,2000(1):82-100.
• [18]Lee M H,Hwang I J.Determinants of corporate R&D investment:An empirical study comparing Korea’s IT industry withits non-IT industry[J].ETR I Journal,2003(4):258-265.
• [19]Gorg H,Strobl E.The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D[J].Economica,2007,294:215-234.
• [20]朱恒鹏.企业规模、市场力量与民营企业创新行为[J].世界经济,2006(12):41-52.
• [21]安同良,施浩,Ludovico Alcorta.中国制造业企业R&D行为模式的观测与实证——基于江苏省制造业企业问卷调查的实证分析[J].经济研究,2006(2):21-30.
• [22]张杰,刘志彪,郑江淮.中国制造业企业创新活动的关键影响因素研究——基于江苏省制造业企业问卷的分析[J].管理世界,2007(6):64-74.
• [23]刘锦英.企业规模与创新绩效关系的实证研究——基于中国光电子产业的分析[J].软科学,2010(4):20-33.
• [24]高良谋,李宇.企业规模与技术创新倒U关系的形成机制与动态拓展[J].管理世界,2009(8):113-123.
• [25]刘小玄.中国工业企业的所有制结构对效率差异的影响[J].经济研究,2000(2):17-25.
• [26]姚洋,章奇.中国工业企业技术效率分析[J].经济研究,2001(10):13-19.
• [27]周黎安,罗凯.企业规模与创新:来自中国省级水平的经验数据[J].经济学,2005(3):623-638.
• [28]吴延兵.市场结构、产权结构与R&D——中国制造业的实证分析[J].统计研究,2007(5):67-75.
• [29]吴延兵,刘霞辉.人力资本与研发行为——基于民营企业调研数据的分析[J].经济学,2009(4):1567-1590.
• [30]柳剑平,郑绪涛,喻美辞.税收、补贴与R&D溢出效应分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005(12):81-90.
• [31]生延超.创新投入补贴还是创新产品补贴:技术联盟的政府策略选择[J].中国管理科学,2008(6):184-192.
• [32]安同良,周绍东,皮建才.R&D补贴对中国企业自主创新的激励效应[J].经济研究,2009(10):87-98.
• [33]朱平芳,徐伟民.政府的科技激励政策对大中型工业企业R&D投入及其专利产出的影响[J].经济研究,2003(6):45-53.
• [34]吴延兵.中国工业R&D投入的影响因素[J].产业经济研究,2009(6):13-21.
• [35]解维敏,唐清泉,陆姗姗.政府资助,企业支出与自主创新——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].金融研究,2009(6):86-99.
• [36]姜宁,黄万.政府补贴对企业R&D投入的影响——基于我国高技术产业的实证分析[J].科学与科学技术管理,2010(7):28-33.