朱红根;姚莉萍;

• 1:江西农业大学经济管理学院

摘要(Abstract)：

利用鄱阳湖区农户微观调查数据,运用Oprobit模型实证分析信息来源对农户湿地功能认知水平及保护态度的影响。研究表明:报纸电视、亲戚朋友是农户获取湿地生态功能信息的主要来源渠道。不同信息来源对农户湿地功能认知及湿地保护态度的影响效应存在一定差异,其中,来自报纸电视的信息对农户湿地生态功能认知水平有重要影响;来自亲戚朋友的信息有利于提高农户湿地生态功能的认知、湿地保护意愿和退耕还湿意愿;来自政府宣传的信息是影响农户湿地功能认知水平、湿地保护意愿以及补偿政策接受意愿的重要因素;来自技术培训的信息对促进农户湿地生态功能认知水平和湿地保护意愿有积极影响;而来自保护区宣传的信息有利于提高农户对湿地功能认知水平和湿地保护意愿。

关键词(KeyWords)： 信息来源;湿地功能认知;湿地保护;影响效应;农户

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目(41261106);; 江西省社科规划项目(11YJ36);; 赣鄱英才“555”工程资助项目

作者(Authors): 朱红根;姚莉萍;

DOI: 10.16195/j.cnki.cn36-1328/f.2016.03.038

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Stern P C,Dietz T.The value basis of environmental concern[J].J Social Issues,1994(50):65-84.
• [2]Sandoz Agro.Informing and educating the public about risk[J].Risk Anal,1993(6):403-415.
• [3]王翔,付川,潘杰,等.三峡库区一级支流苎溪河流域公众环保意识及支付意愿研究[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(22):11920-11922.
• [4]邢美华,张俊飚,黄光体.未参与循环农业农户的环保认知及其影响因素分析——基于晋、鄂两省的调查.[J]中国农村经济,2009(4):72-79.
• [5]王海滨,李奇峰,程序,等.基于参与性调查的密云水库周边农户对生态环境保护的认知与响应[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(12):366-370.
• [6]金晓彤,赵太阳,李杨.营销信息对环保型产品购买意愿的影响研究[J].华东经济管理,2015(7):1-8.
• [7]Heather M Rhodes,Louis S Leland,Brian E Niven.Farmers,streams,information,and money:Does informing farmers about riparian management have any effect[J].Environmental Management,2002,30(5):665-677.
• [8]Mc Intyre A A.Why pesticides received extensive use in America:A political economy of agricultural pest management to 1970[J].Nat Resources J,1987(27):533-578.
• [9]Zilberman D,Sunding D,Dobler M,et al.Who makes pesticide use decisions:implications for policymakers[M].Agricultural and Food Marketing Consortium,Farm Foundation,1994:23-39.
• [10]Wolf S.Cropping systems and conservation policy:The roles of agrichemical dealers and independent crop consultants[J].J Soil Water Conserv,1995(50):263-270.
• [11]Erik Lichtenberg,Rae Zimmerman.Information and farmers’attitudes about pesticides,water quality,and related environmental effects[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,1999(73):227-236
• [12]Joachim Scholderer,Lynn J Frewer.The biotechnology communication paradox:Experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy[J].Journal of Consumer Policy,2003(26):125-157.
• [13]Rousu M,Huffman W E,Shogren J F,et al.The value of verifiable information in a controversial market:Evidence from lab auctions of genetically modified foods[M].IA:Iowa State University,2002.
• [14]Jayson L Lusk.Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food:Evidence from experimental auctions in the United States,England,and France[J].European Review of Agricultural Economics,2004,31(2):179-204.
• [15]Bager T,Proost J.Voluntary regulation and farmers’environmental behaviour in Denmark and The Netherlands[J].Sociologia Ruralis,1997(37):79–96.
• [16]Scholderer J,Frewer L J.The biotechnology communication paradox:Experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy[J].Journal of Consumer Policy,2003(26):125-157.